The Prince of Thieves : Harry Reid Pushes for Online Gambling

60

By Ghost32

Lame Duck Tries To Lay Golden Goose Egg

We saw it coming. When Harry Reid scraped by on November 2, having survived a serious challenge by Sharron Angle, it was clear as good glass that the Searchlight Slimer owed somebody...big time. It had to be that way; not even crooked voting machines could fully account for his political survival in 2010.

Now we know who: The big Nevada casino operators.

Not that We the People needed a hub to explain that. When it comes to real power in the desert state known for legalized gambling and crushed dreams, there's not much but the casino industry--certainly nothing to compete with the whistles and bells in in Las Vegas, Loughlin, Reno, etc. Oh, Tonopah once had the Stealth Bomber--its development started there--but long term residents in that high desert town are still ticked about the day the Stealth pulled out and went elsewhere.

So it's no surprise that Hapless Harry would try slicking a bill through the Senate that would allow his home state to cash in on the online gambling craze (which Congress effectively outlawed four years ago). No surprise at all. Nor that he'd try to lame-duck it through before all those meanie conservative Republicans take over the House in January.

No, it's no surprise. It is, however, one more underscoring of Senator Reid's disregard for anything but looking out for Number One.

At a time when there's neither a federal budget in place for the coming year. So, the expense would be borne by the "weakest members of the herd", those who hope to double the rent money and instead lose it all online, back to being homeless? So what? Ho-hum.

You think that's an exaggeration? Really? True story: When Pam and I met in 1996 (in a Tonopah laundromat, as it happened), her companion was a dysfunctional fellow named Richard who did exactly that. Because of what Richard did (used her debit card to take out the cash and then lost all of it at the video poker machines), Pam's rent check bounced. Had she not decided to dump Poor Richard without so much as an Almanac, putting her life in my hands, the two of them would have indeed been evicted from their studio apartment...which Pam had managed to obtain for them after more than two years of homelessness.

That's who will pay the price for Reid's recklessness: The poor, the downtrodden, the drug addicted (Richard was), and the otherwise just plain hopeless among us...plus, of course, their families and--if they have any--friends. In other words, the very people Democrats across the country claim to champion!

Will Reckless Reid somehow succeed, slick this through whilehe's still a limping quacker of a Majority Misleader in the Senate? Not likely, really. Senate Republicans have vowed (in a letter signed by all 42 of 'em) to block all legislation until the Big Two--budget and taxes--are handled. Most likely, his sneak attack is going nowhere...though when it comes to sneak, Horrible Harry is a regular Gollum of a guy, so you never know.

However, regardless of the outcome on this particular issue, Reid has "gone and done it" in one respect for sure...an unintended consequence of his back room wheeling and dealing attempts. That consequence is: It made me think about long term planning for future elections. With a prompt from Fitnezz Jim, I've already set up a hub category for Remember in November 2012, but that's not enough. We need a category for Remember in November 2016 (when Harry Reid next faces reelection at the age of 972, or close to it).

This page will kick that one off.

Then, obviously, as soon as the right inspiration for Remember in November 2014 comes along, slaps me upside the head, we'll set that one up, too.

Who knows? By my 100th birthday, maybe--just maybe--the idea of long term planning will have caught on among conservatives. Progressives have been doing it for nearly a century now; why should they have all the fun?

Remember in November 2016...whether or no Harry Reid succumbs to Alzheimer's first.

Comments

eovery profile image

eovery 18 months ago

So is Palin and Jindal running for re-eletcton in 2016?

Keep on hubbing!

FitnezzJim profile image

FitnezzJim Level 6 Commenter 18 months ago

For us that are aging, we can think of this as advanced planning for dealing with long term memory loss. On the other hand, I have a suspicion that politician have relied on collective memory loss or distraction as part of the process that allows them to do what they want, hoping that we forget by time the next election comes around.

The internet helps change that.

We the people recognizing that 'we are the government' also helps.

Great stuff, and I hope the Hubs get visited fairly regularly.

Ghost32 profile image

Ghost32 Hub Author 18 months ago

Eovery, it's (obviously) too soon to tell, but that WOULD be a highly acceptable situation!

Jim: Thanks...and I agree, the Internet does help change that, along with "we are the government". Another thing that's helping--sort of like a burr under a saddle blanket--is having the Progressives show their hand so strongly when they did.

Talk about a wake-up call.

Mr Tindle profile image

Mr Tindle 18 months ago

Hey Ghost32,

Thanks for the info in this hub. I wasn't aware that Reid had taken to support the legalization of Online Gambling.

I'm not a fan of Reid at all (Way too much of supporter of big government), but I actually think its great that he is supporting legislation that would give us the freedom to gamble online.

True, he has his own political motives, but I think more importantly it would help the struggling Vegas/Nevada economy (very hard hit from the Housing mess). Also it would help other states that didn't interfere. Jobs and Businesses would be created which everyone needs right now.

Lastly but probably most important, the federal government really doesn't have any right to be telling you, me, or anyone else that we can't make wagers on the internet!

Ghost32 profile image

Ghost32 Hub Author 18 months ago

True enough on it being none of government's business. Of course, there's still plenty of online gambling available--it's just that it's all based offshore for the moment, so none of the revenue is accruing to Nevada (or any other onshore casino).

One thing I neglected to include is that Reid's proposed legislation would limit participation to casino operators who've been in business for at least five years. Which makes sense, since it's most likely the long established gambling operations in Nevada that helped keep him in the Senate.

However, I do have a problem with legalized gambling. As a social worker handling cases on an Indian (now Native American) Reservation in Montana, I saw WHO was pumping the video poker machines--and it was the people who could least afford it. I guess a few hours of relief and hope gained by selling their food stamps for cash to play...well, that might have been worth it for them, I suppose, despite starving for the other 29 days of the month.

Also, my wife had a gambling addiction goin' on for some years after we met. She has pretty good control of it now, but more than once I had to clean up a mess she'd left behind from bounced checks she didn't realize were bad when she wrote 'em.

Bottom line of all bottom lines, though, was noticing that Reid was still and always hammering what would do HIM the most good--not the nation as a whole. I doubt he even cares about Nevada per se, just that enough voters see him as bringing home the pork.

Wealthmadehealthy profile image

Wealthmadehealthy Level 2 Commenter 17 months ago

Well, this is interesting indeed. I was under the impression they outlawed online gambling a year or so ago.

This is not a good thing in my eyes either. For one thing, it allows people to possibly be hacked for credit cards, for what better place to hack into than an online gambling operation??

Great information here. But sad to hear it. Have an awesome day!!

Ghost32 profile image

Ghost32 Hub Author 17 months ago

Congress did outlaw it (about FOUR years ago)...but only within U.S. borders. Even the Congress-critters haven't figure out quite how to snag the offshore folks yet.

Harry is trying to reverse that for Nevada, at least. If he could get a sweetheart deal that didn't spread that Money Love to other states, he'd no doubt be one happy bilge rat.

Submit a Comment
Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.



    • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
    • Comments are not for promoting your Hubs or other sites

    Please wait working