Change Your Handwriting, Change Your Life : One Key Pivot Point

73

By Ghost32

1980

The idea that you could change your life by changing your handwriting--or even by merely changing your signature--was hardly uppermost on my mind when I began my study of handwriting analysis in early 1980. Rather, having studied both serious psychology (extensively) and serious astrology (briefly), I simply wanted to be able to gain serious insight into other people with or without their knowledge or--quite frankly--consent.

Sound nasty?

Perhaps it was. In any event, I had yet to fully appreciate the need to know myself before worrying overmuch about the rest of the human race...but a wakeup call was a-comin', big time. Two books had come into my life, graphoanalysis texts put together by a fellow named Milton N. Bunker (no relation to Archie that I know of). His organization, the International Graphoanalysis Society (IGAS. and don't ask me if he'd thought that acronym through thoroughly before adopting it!) sold me both volumes...and I set to reading. Studying. Analyzing handwriting wherever it could be found.

I was about to experience the shock of my life.

Milton N. Bunker in 1910, a Kansas shorthand teacher at the time.
See all 4 photos
Milton N. Bunker in 1910, a Kansas shorthand teacher at the time.

Self-Discovery

My original search for better methods of gaining insights into almost anyone did indeed bear fruit...and lots of it. An inveterate liar will jump out from the handwritten page and slap me upside the head in a heartbeat to this day. So will the individual who is always out for Number One and only Number One, or the adult in years who is still devastatingly immature, just for example.

But the axe handle between the eyes hit as I applied the proven methods of graphoanalysis to my own handwriting--and more than anything else, to my signature. Folks had tried to tell me I had issues all along, but they were jerks, right?

Wrong. Well, maybe they were jerks, but the ugly truth was that, more often than not, their criticisms were based in fact.

I hadn't changed my signature one bit since grade school. Had I been "all good" as a kid, that would have been fine--but there were "things" in that signature (as well as in the rest of my handwriting), aspects of my personality, that I did not like one little bit. They were simply not acceptable.

A "Few" Little Shortcomings

There were three key negative personality aspects  that I purely hated (plus half a dozen more that were a bit irritating).  The three worst were:

1. Sharp points on some of the finishing strokes. They were particularly noticeable in the final stroke which curved back over the top of the entire signature, in a small d, and in the stroke atop a capital  F. Guess what? Anyone with that stroke has an irritability problem. Doesn't matter whether or not the waspish nature shows outwardly (mine did at times); it exists. Temper, temper. That had to go.

2. The super-tall d stem (out of proportion to the lower loop) indicated the very opposite of independence (a trait I'd thought I owned!)...and the opposite of independence (it turns out) is out-of-balance pride. As in, pride goeth before a fall. To gain true self confidence, it seemed, pride had to be abolished.

3. Artistic and graceful (I'd thought!), the final, back-curving overstroke...is there a more PC word for sucks?!   It turned out to be a bit too much what it looked like, a horrible attachment to the past, not exactly the mark of Mr. Self-Reliant. Ouch!

So I decided, being unable to avoid the grim conclusion that I'd been a self-blind jerk from Day One worthy of comparison with today's Charlie Sheen--okay, not quite that; I just looked at his handwriting. But still, not great.

With that knowledge in hand, it was time to change my life by changing my handwriting. FAIR WARNING! The course materials shouted, "DON'T TRY THIS AT HOME!" It seems you can really mess up your life by trying to do too much, too fast, too hard, without supervision.

Yeah? So? Accepting supervision and/or guidance was never anything I wanted to learn to do, then or now. It could mess me up? Big deal! I was already messed up! Time was of the essence! Within days, I'd decided on a new signature...which has been in place from that day (in March, 1980, if memory serves) forward.

See all those sharp point at the end of strokes in Heather Locklear's writing?  Testy!  Testy!
See all those sharp point at the end of strokes in Heather Locklear's writing? Testy! Testy!
Woody Allen's tall d stem indicates overweening pride in himself.
Woody Allen's tall d stem indicates overweening pride in himself.
My "early" signature had an overarching, temper-sharpened, extreme backward-looking final stroke much like this one.
My "early" signature had an overarching, temper-sharpened, extreme backward-looking final stroke much like this one.

Graphoanalysis Books at Amazon

The Encyclopedic Dictionary for Graphoanalysts
Amazon Price: $26.90
Basic Traits of Graphoanalysis (Two Volumes)
Amazon Price: $55.00

Personality Upgrade

Sticking to just the three problem areas outlined above, the revised signature accomplished the following:

1. Elimination of strokes ending in sharp, tapered points. There was still an occasional taper-off at the end of the capital B--a bit of backsliding that needed regular attention--but even that stroke lacked the "twist" that produces a sharp point. The remaining stroke endings were all blunt, firm, and square. Summary: Testiness almost completely eliminated.

2. The d stem was much closer to being in balance. Not stubby enough for the "true independent", which I understood from the beginning would not be my goal, but enough to get rid of that look-at-great-little-me problem. Summary: Much better self-evaluation.

3. Replacement of the squirrely backstroke with a strong underscore--which does not shout independence but does indicate self-reliance, my top priority in the personality makeover. Summary: About time!

Once this makeover was instituted, two key questions remained to be answered: Would it actually work, and would I have to pay a horrendous price for charging in where angels feared to tread without a graphoanalysis counselor looking over my shoulder? The answers were and are: Yes...and yes.

Very briefly, the following 31 years saw me through five more divorces, two bankruptcies, one foreclosure, an attempt by a certain group of folks to see me destitute and in prison, an attempt by cops to frame my sorry tail, and a whole lot of other "stuff".

Yet on the other side of that, sticking to my guns and hammer down throughout those same years--when all was said and done--Life also saw me build a business that grossed in excess of two million dollars over time, survive every attack without so much as getting arrested even once, win the love of my life in wife #7, and come into my own when I built our Border Fort in southern Arizona. Not to mention becoming (as a close friend recently put it) a "hardcore Tea Partier" and (amazingly) a highly effective public speaker when I need to be.

Go figure.

Talk about a pivot point.

Bottom line: 'Tis said that personality changes are always reflected in a person's handwriting. Not so often, however, is it pointed out that the reverse is equally true, that you can change your life by changing your handwriting...though you may be in for a wild ride.

No sharp temper-points here!  Ronald Reagan's signature also shows his extreme independence in the almost nonexistent height of the d stem.
No sharp temper-points here! Ronald Reagan's signature also shows his extreme independence in the almost nonexistent height of the d stem.
The strong underscore indicates self-reliance.
The strong underscore indicates self-reliance.

Comments

Old Poolman profile image

Old Poolman Level 7 Commenter 14 months ago

Interesting, just plain old interesting. These are things I never knew, and never really thought of before. I learned a bunch from reading this hub. Your knowledge of so many subjects never ceases to amaze me.

Wealthmadehealthy profile image

Wealthmadehealthy Level 2 Commenter 14 months ago

And I wonder what the handwriting experts are able to tell when they are asked to verify someones signature as legit or forged?? Is this why they make you sign traffic tickets? It seems to me that if you were able to define

sucktacular,suckadelic,and suckalicious ness that you wanted to change, how many people could better themselves if they worked on their handwriting.

Altho, being able to amass as much money as you were able shows me that you are a stick to it kind of guy...And that is why you were able to do what you have done....on the border....Great hub...more people need to look at the way they write in order to perform personality changes it seems.

Ghost32 profile image

Ghost32 Hub Author 14 months ago

Mike, sometimes it even startles me a little bit. As a young buck, looking ahead, no way could I have foreseen the learning curve. Happy to hear you found the hub informative. During the time I was studying graphoanalysis, it definitely had me by the attention span--I even gave serious thought to going all the way, get started as a pro handwriting analyst, all that.

Didn't make that leap in the end, though.

WMH, the answer to your question is a great big "It depends". A lot of the folks who study "legit vs. forged" don't really do a whole lot with personality analysis--they're all about the fraud thing and leave it at that. But others...yeah. With the graphoanalysis method specifically, I seriously doubt any skilled analyst could avoid noticing a "bunch of stuff" about the person they were checking out for authenticity.

For example, I haven't done any brushing up in the field since the early 80s--yet still couldn't help noticing the fat d loop in Charlie Sheen's writing. Nothing new, but that form is an indicator of being overly touchy, thin skinned, as he's certainly shown himself to be.

It may not be true, though, that more people need to follow the track I took. It was the right path for me, but it's a hard enough row to hoe that it might be way too much to pay for the whistle in a lot of cases.

Wealthmadehealthy profile image

Wealthmadehealthy Level 2 Commenter 14 months ago

Well, with all the hoopla Sheen is causing someone needs to look into it. lol

Ghost32 profile image

Ghost32 Hub Author 14 months ago

Perhaps...except that Charlie has made it crystal clear that he has no desire and no intention to change. Seems like that might be a bit of a factor, no?

earnestshub profile image

earnestshub Level 2 Commenter 14 months ago

Hi Ghost. I saw the title and it was very well chosen, grabbed me straight away out of the mass of hubs offered in my daily email from hubpages of hubbers I follow.

Your story sounds a lot like a journey of self discovery similar to that reported by many who have had psychotherapy. I found the first hand report very enlightening, and probably the best explanation I have seen about handwriting analysis. Well done! I "liked" it on facebook and voted it up/awesome.

Genna East profile image

Genna East Level 6 Commenter 14 months ago

Fascinating...remind me to never sign anything ever again. :) My handwriting changes a bit when I am under a lot of stress…does that mean I have a problem?

Your devoted paranoid…

Genna

Ghost32 profile image

Ghost32 Hub Author 14 months ago

Thanks, Earnest. I believe you're right--except, of course, that I've always insisted on being my own psychotherapist, never once trusting any "licensed shrink" to point me in a direction I could find for myself.

With the exception of my 7 (sequential) wives, that is. Every one of THEM--most certainly including Pam--had and/or has lessons to teach me. Wife #4, Sa Lee, handed out a corker when she pointed out,

"Whenever you start really kicking and screaming, we know we're getting close to the truth."

Ouch.

Sincerely, though: Sa Lee, if you ever happen to read this, I THANK YOU FROM THE BOTTOM OF MY HEART. And yes, I'm still reading my "bull boards". (She'll know what that means.)

Genna, most of us vary our handrwiting under stress. It does not mean you have a problem. One surprising thing (at least it was to me) is that in Bunker's system of graphoanalysis, what looks quite different to the naked and untrained eye will still produce the same findings if subjected to rigorous analysis. I used to marvel at that, checking and rechecking, but the results were remarkably consistent--stress or no stress.

As for paranoia...being paranoid can be a good thing! (Pam is a paranoid schizophrenic, though she has remarkable control.) And as they say, you're not paranoid if they really are after you! :)

schauhan912 profile image

schauhan912 14 months ago

Interesting...interesting....interesting.Hats off to you!

crystolite profile image

crystolite 14 months ago

Nice work,keep it up.

FGual profile image

FGual Level 3 Commenter 14 months ago

This is insightful. I never took handwriting analysis seriously, maybe I should. Perhaps I should study what my artistic looping signature means, maybe the answer to the meaning of life is there.

Ghost32 profile image

Ghost32 Hub Author 14 months ago

Schauhan912 and Crystolite: Thanks.

FGual: There's definitely something to it. If you do decide to study, you'll find that Bunker's system is unique within the field. (I didn't link to it, but Googling "International Graphoanalysis Society" will get you there.) Milton didn't go in for "overall appearance" like some of the other systems do. Instead, the focus is on individual STROKES. Angle, length, frequency of repetition, how hard the writer was pressing down (or not), etc.

He also had a pretty rigorous standard for determining whether or not an indicator was or was not real: If a stroke (let's say the signature underscore) proved out 1,000 TIMES without missing, he considered it valid.

How he applied that standard to the number of different strokes--or, for that matter, how he made all the CONNECTIONS between a given stroke and its corresponding personality trait--is a major mystery to me. But he did, and his system works, so hey.

Genna East profile image

Genna East Level 6 Commenter 14 months ago

Oh dear...I didn't mean to offend with my comment about being paranoid; it was meant, tongue in cheek, regarding my thoughts about never signing anything again. I didn't think how it would relate to Pam; my apologies.

Ghost32 profile image

Ghost32 Hub Author 14 months ago

Genna, you didn't offend anyone! Pam is quite open about her various challenges, be they in the physical health or the mental health area.

Wealthmadehealthy profile image

Wealthmadehealthy Level 2 Commenter 14 months ago

rofl Came back to reread....ROFL ROFL...again, great hub rofl.....

Ghost32 profile image

Ghost32 Hub Author 14 months ago

Thanks again! (You even made ME reread it one more time!)

Submit a Comment
Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.



    • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
    • Comments are not for promoting your Hubs or other sites

    Please wait working