American Hunters : Homeland Security at its Most Secure
80Just the Facts, Ma'am
Not unlike Switzerland, our American mainland remains secure from invasion by foreign armies...though in our case, it's because of hunters. Whether or not one believes we should be fighting foreign wars, whether or not one would starve rather than chow down on Bambi or Bullwinkle, that fact is literally indisputable.
Here's why.
I just received an email pointing out a few statistics. No, not stats on the number of venison steaks in the average freezer--just the sheer number of hunting permits issued in various states. Since nobody ponies up for a permit without having at least a lever action .30-30 in the gun cabinet, it's safe to accept the premise that there are more rifles "out there" in the Heartland than the number of permits...since some folks surely do own firearms purely for self defense.
Well, duh.
The email's first paragraph:
In WWII, Japan's highest ranking naval officer was Isoruku Yamamoto. Although he was Japanese, and his loyalties were unquestionably with The Empire, he studied for many years in America, graduating from Harvard University. There is an oft-repeated (and sometimes disputed) quote attributed to him regarding the possibility of any nation taking a war to American soil:
"You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass."
While Yamamoto may or may not have actually said that, it does get the point across rather well. Civilians in the USA pack a lot of accumulative firepower...and we remain free because of that simple fact. Many of us (myself included) are wary always of the Enemy Within and would not put it past the "wrong bunch" to get themselves elected and promptly attempt to confiscate every projectile weapon in the land--and then go after the edged stuff, thank you very much.
But we tend to overlook the overwhelming deterrent we heat-packing "common folk" present to the aggressor nations around the planet. After all, nukes or no nukes, you've got to be able to put boots on the ground if you're going to occupy any country...and there are times when our awesome armed forces (and they are indeed awesome) are pretty much occupied elsewhere.
Potential enemies, however, can read Fish & Wildlife stats as well as we can. For example:
Here is why he (Yamamoto) was correct:
America's Hunters. The World's Largest Army.
The state of Wisconsin has gone an entire deer hunting season without someone getting killed. That's great, considering there were over 600,000 hunters that got permits this year.
Allow me to restate that number.
Over the last two months, the eighth largest army in the world - more men under arms than Iran; more than France and Germany combined - deployed to the woods of a single American state to keep the deer population under control.
Those figures got my attention...especially since I'd never really thought that much about Wisconsin being a great place to hunt. Growing up in the wide open spaces of western Montana as I did, still hunting in the thick woods of Wisconsin with a slug-loaded shotgun just never appealed to me.
Even so...one of those big ol' slugs would surely stop a foregin invader right well, wouldn't it?
Okay, then. Are the weapons just, perhaps, thicker in Wisconsin than elsewhere? A fluke, maybe?
But that pales in comparison to the 750,000 who are in the woods of Pennsylvania this week. Michigan's 700,000 hunters have now returned home. Toss in a quarter million hunters in West Virginia, and it is literally the case that the hunters of those four states alone would comprise the largest army in the world.
And that is just FOUR states.
The total population of registered hunters in America today ranges from 23 million to 43.7 million individuals. (Based on annual data provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.)
As long as the American Hunter retains his right to Bear Arms, America will forever be safe from foreign invasion of troops.
Hunting - it's not just a way to fill the freezer. It's a matter of national security.
Got it. Homeland Security the old school way, American hunters! In other words, scratch a gun control advocate, uncover a traitor, a collaborator, a quisling, a liberal, a Progressive. Scratch a hunter, you find an armed Defender of the Homeland.
Maybe you also get punched out, depending on who you are and where you scratch him (or her!).
Since fact checking is generally a good thing to do, especially when writing articles based on anonymous emails (!), I went to the U.S. Fish & Wildlife landing page for hunting to see how close state hunting numbers actually were to those claimed.
Not very, as it turned out--yet still enough for America's hunters to be fairly dubbed the largest army in the world:
The most recent survey report (2006) indicated in that year:
- 12.5 million people 16 years old and older enjoyed hunting a variety of animals within the United States. They hunted 220 million days and took 185 million trips. Hunting expenditures totaled $22.9 billion.
Okay, not nearly 43 million hunters, but "only" 12.5 million as of 5 years ago. Yet...what do the state stats show? It was time to head on over to this page to find out:
Wisconsin...697,000 hunters. More than the email claimed!
Pennsylvania.....1,044,000 hunters. More than the email claimed!
Maybe somebody at Fish & Wildlife couldn't figure out how to add up all those big state numbers to get the right national total?
No matter. Anyway you cut the steak, we have enough hunters in these 50 states (50, not 57--the Heinz 57 goes on the steaks when we chow down) to give aggressor nations pause...and to give PETA absolute fits. Either of which, as Martha Stewart would say, is a good thing.
Let's keep it that way.
vote upvote downshareprintflag
- Useful (2)
- Funny (1)
- Awesome (2)
- Beautiful (2)
- Interesting
CommentsLoading...
Fred, another great hub from one of my favorites. I knew that the number of hunters would be high, but had no idea how high until I read the numbers you gave. This would make a rather large group of armed people if they were all put together in one place.
However, every group needs a leader to be effective. Before the first shot could be fired the left and the right would have to meet and argue for days, weeks, or months, as to who was in charge of this civilian Army. By the time this decision was made and signed into law, it might be too late.
However, it is interesting how the most avid anti-gun person is very thankful when someone with a concealed carry permit saves their butt from certain death. Not thankful enough to change their opinion regarding guns, but thankful they are still alive to hate guns another day. Go figure.
This is testament to the high-quality of writing you put into each of your hubs, Ghost (being many years your junior, I can’t bring myself to call you Fred without your permission, sir. I guess a few of the kids in America still have the danged “respect for their elders” bug. Ha.)
I am actually a member of many animal funds, an animal lover some would say (others not so subtly might call me a “liberal douche” in this particular section of politics) but I find myself very intrigued by this article and sentiment and actually see it, in the big picture, as a very humane article. I mean by that the ability to inspire hope in your countryman, though no doubt that specific “hope” is not the type most Presidential Administrations care for, ha ha.
U.S.A. has the most impressive military force by tools (material) and tradition (intellectual, patriotism) as a matter of not sheer arrogant boast but substance. We are powerful not merely because of our engines, but the relationship that every well-trained soldier holds in his heart with the common American citizen. I once heard in a political forum on Myspace, back in the good old days before those groups were absolutely shredded by spammers, that the common citizen might be weary of big government but she also not be terrified of a martial-law state owing to the loyalty of the military forces to the American citizenry themselves.
Those farther left than I have a hideous caricature of the armed forces (as the right surely knows)- this idea that a strong military state would with the scepter of power pull all sorts of war crimes, whatever most feasible convenient on the people. This is another delusion of the over-sheltered “intellectual” far removed from the reality of a state’s fragility without a well-trained patriotic force.
In a sense, if the administration ever used the arm of the Guard to pacify the common citizen, I believe they themselves would find an “enemy within” ironically as their enforcer is healthily populated by the sons, daughters, and even patricians of the masses they would foolishly seek to conquer. A true case of “biting the hand that feeds you” or “(making excrement) where one eats.”
Humorously, though, this puts forth a reality of undreamed potentials (and I imagine Thaddeus von Ponytail of the Al Gore Institute isn’t a subscriber to this e-mail service, meaning he will live in blissful ignorance until an “interesting” era penetrates his comfort-bubble.) It’s too funny. Newkirk and Peta members ire aside, the not-so-grateful of their military protectors liberals would no doubt lose their minds if they had the full statistics on precisely how large their defense force was.
Hubpages has a diamond in the rough of information coverage in the vast media of the net with you, friend. Once again I hope no opportunist flags any “inconvenient truths” to use the phrase ironically. I will certainly look for more journalists of common sense- and common compassion for their American citizens. But for the time being, you have the burden of the monopoly of good sense.
Use your power wisely! Ha ha!
Happy Hubbing, Fred. Best wishes for you and the troops at the border fort. :-)
Sincerely,
Nick
Japanese are a very practical people. ;-) (Heh, it's no secret my fascination with the artistic aspects of East Asian culture when one sees my profile's manga (comics) and anime (cartoons) reviews.
But that quote in general seems to resonate well with the risks of striking a population in their homeland where they know the terrain and hold immediate advantages.
To the east again, in the immortal Sun Tzu revered by all sensible people east and west, "it is unwise and inhumane to both the attacker and defenders troops to keep a closed circle around the defending army."
While my book doesn't elaborate on this, I think he was referring to the fluidity, ability to re-shape a scenario when the enemy flees in the one left-open path. He does talk about the obvious dangers that a force totally surrounded with perform desperate acts that could have been prepared against and avoided.
It reminds me of the film: "We were Soldiers" the Mel Gibson one about Viet Nam, I watched in high school. It was actually a scene cut from the movie. One of the at-home advisors tells Gibson's character something along the lines of "We'll force their asses back home." To which he replies, sensibly but potently, "Will all due respect, sir. They ARE home." Referring to their desperation, they had nothing lose.
This concept applies internationally, I believe. It's not a Japanese thing, a Vietnamese thing, or an American thing. It's a patriotism and cultural thing. You take big risks by forcing a group into the corner, particularly if they know that "corner" backwards-forwards.
As a side, I think it's great ahorseback has traditional arms. Like most technology, there was more artistic appeal to the older stuff.
I agree, Sir. Homeland security can fight terrorism. It's every people's concern.
Gosh...we suddenly feel very, very safe, when it comes
to suggestions of foreign invaders, terrorism or
martial law. We do not own a gun, but in a revolution
or 'war', we'd be happy to clean the weapons or re-load
for the patriot soldier.
Is it any wonder that the Obama administration would like
to ban privately held guns?











ahorseback Level 7 Commenter 16 months ago
I had heard that Quote from the Japanese before , Its all such a wild ride isn't it , this gun control thing.
Most of my guns are black powder , Hey , Im a romantic for the old days! What can I say.......great hub!